Page 1 of 1

Revell 1/72 dambusters lancaster

Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2018 9:35 pm
by gaz45
The finish
Not the best of kits with a few fit issues but i got there in the end.

Unfortunatly when i was moving it to take the final reveal pics the plane fell from the plastic rod and w wing and an engine came off :wall:

I don't have the time to fix it before the deadline what with work commitments so i'll just post the final pics i had from the build thread

Image

Image

Image

Thanks again for taking a look and for all your comments

Re: Revell 1/72 dambusters lancaster

Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2018 9:42 pm
by Twokidsnosleep
LOVE IT
:banana: :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana:

The bouncing bomb is awesome :clap:
Really well done mate a good finish indeed :thumb2:
Thanks for being part of the sig, we had some fun long the way
:cheers2: Scott

Re: Revell 1/72 dambusters lancaster

Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2018 6:59 am
by TommyKillander
Excellent work, my friend! :banana:

I love the composition, looks really cool :thumb2:

Well done! :clap: :clap: :bow::

:cheers2:
Tommy

Re: Revell 1/72 dambusters lancaster

Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2018 8:15 am
by Gary30
Sorry about the wing damage, trust me, I know how frustrating things like that are :bash:

Angle of attack looks a bit steep to clear the dam for me as well, pilot would need new underwear I think :o

Lovely looking lanc though! I should stop looking at these final reveals.....something else added to my wishlist, thanks for that!!! :wall:

Re: Revell 1/72 dambusters lancaster

Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2018 9:41 am
by Tomcat64
Awesome work Gaz - love the concept and the execution!

Real shame about the damage, please post some finished photos when you've had chance to sort it as I'd love to see how it finally turns out.

Re: Revell 1/72 dambusters lancaster

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2018 7:08 pm
by Kevthemodeller
Cracking Lac mate love the Dam diorama :th: :clap:

Re: Revell 1/72 dambusters lancaster

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2018 8:44 pm
by pourquoi61
What a great idea, wonderful imagination you have. :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:

Re: Revell 1/72 dambusters lancaster

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2018 4:25 am
by dogsbody
The bomb would never be in front of the aircraft. Also, the aircraft was flying level at 60ft. above the water, when the bomb was dropped.


Chris

Re: Revell 1/72 dambusters lancaster

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2018 5:09 am
by Twokidsnosleep
dogsbody wrote: Sat Sep 01, 2018 4:25 am The bomb would never be in front of the aircraft. Also, the aircraft was flying level at 60ft. above the water, when the bomb was dropped.


Chris
:hand: :shhh: :shhh:

Re: Revell 1/72 dambusters lancaster

Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2018 3:38 am
by digger303
thumbs up :banana: :banana: :th: :th: :bow:: :cheers2:

Re: Revell 1/72 dambusters lancaster

Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2018 12:30 pm
by gaz45
Thanks guys

Re: Revell 1/72 dambusters lancaster

Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2018 8:40 pm
by demarcation
Looks great, beautiful work!! :th: :th: :clap:

Re: Revell 1/72 dambusters lancaster

Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2018 10:39 am
by gaz45
Thanks mate

Re: Revell 1/72 dambusters lancaster

Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2018 2:56 pm
by Quax
dogsbody wrote: Sat Sep 01, 2018 4:25 am The bomb would never be in front of the aircraft. Also, the aircraft was flying level at 60ft. above the water, when the bomb was dropped.


Chris
Well that was a classy interjection Dogsbody, well done... :clap:

I think it was great Gaz and I'm with Tomcat, please post the pictures when you get the chance to fix it and position how you want. :bow:: :bow::
Paul

Re: Revell 1/72 dambusters lancaster

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 2:52 am
by dogsbody
Quax wrote: Mon Sep 10, 2018 2:56 pm
dogsbody wrote: Sat Sep 01, 2018 4:25 am The bomb would never be in front of the aircraft. Also, the aircraft was flying level at 60ft. above the water, when the bomb was dropped.


Chris
Well that was a classy interjection Dogsbody, well done... :clap:

I think it was great Gaz and I'm with Tomcat, please post the pictures when you get the chance to fix it and position how you want. :bow:: :bow::
Paul
I just thought physical and historical accuracy might be allowed. If not, oh well.


Chris

Re: Revell 1/72 dambusters lancaster

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 8:37 am
by Quax
No you're right Chris historical accuracy is very important especially to you it would seem, having looked through your previous postings I can find a lot that refer to historical accuracy starting in 2016 when you criticised a newbie for his Swordfish then there was the Beaufighter that wasn't up to scratch nor the Gladiator. The thing that mystified me is that I couldn't find a post with a model in it that you'd built. Now, for historical accuracy you understand, I'm more than willing for you to make my day and point me in the right direction.

Gaz I can only offer you my heartfelt apologies for hijacking your thread but this guys got "form"!
Paul

Re: Revell 1/72 dambusters lancaster

Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2018 12:00 pm
by gaz45
No problem mate Thanks

Re: Revell 1/72 dambusters lancaster

Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2018 1:06 pm
by Kevthemodeller
Quax wrote: Wed Sep 12, 2018 8:37 am No you're right Chris historical accuracy is very important especially to you it would seem, having looked through your previous postings I can find a lot that refer to historical accuracy starting in 2016 when you criticised a newbie for his Swordfish then there was the Beaufighter that wasn't up to scratch nor the Gladiator. The thing that mystified me is that I couldn't find a post with a model in it that you'd built. Now, for historical accuracy you understand, I'm more than willing for you to make my day and point me in the right direction.

Gaz I can only offer you my heartfelt apologies for hijacking your thread but this guys got "form"!
Paul
Well said Paul and I totally agree :th:

Quite why certain individuals just want to criticise the efforts of others is beyond me :hand: :pistols:

Re: Revell 1/72 dambusters lancaster

Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2018 11:18 am
by gaz45
Thanks guys means a lot i just model for me has i think most of us do :th: :cheers2: